- #Eplan p8 vs autocad electrical update
- #Eplan p8 vs autocad electrical pro
- #Eplan p8 vs autocad electrical software
- #Eplan p8 vs autocad electrical windows
NET framework 4.7.2 is required to operate the EPLAN Platform. The EPLAN user interface language installed must be supported by the operating system.
#Eplan p8 vs autocad electrical windows
The EPLAN Platform supports the 64-bit variants of the Microsoft operating systems Windows 7, 8.1 and Windows 10.
#Eplan p8 vs autocad electrical pro
But we are confident that once implementation is complete, Pro Panel will reduce development time by as much as 50 percent while increasing the level of detail in the information provided to the production team. That includes understanding the differences between US and European approaches to control panel design. It requires everyone to follow new standards, and the learning curve can be steep. Adopting New ProcessesĪdopting any new process can be challenging. We can also use EPLAN to send information to our automated wire processing machines, saving time and minimizing the risk of introducing errors. We now have four of them in our facilities, and can use Pro Panel to export native files directly to Kiesling software. For example, Design Ready Controls was the first mechatronics manufacturer in the United States to use a Kiesling Perforex machine for drilling, milling, and tapping holes in enclosures. Our initial estimates indicate a significant increase in our ability to generate documentation.ĮPLAN works well with our advanced facilities.
#Eplan p8 vs autocad electrical software
The software lets us account for bending radiuses and component clearance before the files are released to the floor. We can run rules to see if a wiring duct is too full, and link accessories to see whether they are required for a component. We also use EPLAN to optimize wire routing for material conservation, heat spacing, and component interference. Now we have these programs together in one suite, where all that information is accurate and standardized when creating schematics and 3D models. The ability to associate cut sheets and certification information (UL, CE) means engineers have more relevant data at their fingertips.Įveryone has access to the most current information, which saves time and guards against the introduction of errors. Physical information is added, including schematic symbols and 3D models that represent the component in both schematic and layout environments.
As parts are added to the database, they are categorized by function (relay, protection device, switch, etc.). Standardization involves a lot of front-end work in error checking, vetting component setup, and having subject matter experts verify data accuracy. It’s a continually growing process, a constant evolution of the database. Because the database holds information at the component level, updates or changes made to that part apply to all future inquiries users will always have the most up-to-date information. This is similar in nature to our own Automated Panel Expert (APE®) it creates a source that can be updated if a problem arises so that the problem never occurs again.
#Eplan p8 vs autocad electrical update
We went from treating it as computer-aided design and drafting (CAD) software to more of a computer-aided engineering (CAE) one with a unified database, from which we can update all data and synchronize information and the engineering processes. Two of our departments-electrical controls and mechanical engineering-are using the Pro Panel feature of EPLAN. As an early adopter in this country, we get to shape and standardize some of the details before others even begin.
Design Ready Controls has been using EPLAN for the past 10 years. Its software suite includes Electric p8, Pro Panel and Harness ProD, all developed with a focus on electrical design. In Europe, however, EPLAN is the leader in electrical CAD. AutoCad Electrical is more focused on the generation of electrical schematics. For years, AutoCad has been the leading CAD software in the United States.
0 kommentar(er)
